Frequently Asked Questions
What are community rights?
Community rights means that people who live in the community have the right to make the decisions that affect their well-being and future. Today, however, communities across the country are finding that they don’t have the right to make critical decisions for themselves – such as the right to say “no” to fracking or factory farming, and the right to say “yes” to sustainable energy and healthy local food systems.
The movement for community rights in the United States arose to stop this corruption of our democracy. Enacting community rights will enable people within a community to make important decisions reflecting the people, land, and special conditions that exist within each area, creating and enforcing laws that provide for the well-being and sustainability of their communities.
Why do we need a community rights movement?
Over the last 200 years, corporations have manufactured a structure of law in which they have ever-increasing rights and privileges today, allowing the pre-emption of community self-determination when corporate interests are at stake.
Corporations prioritize maximizing profit, typically for distant investors who have no connection to the community; consequently the best interests of the community and its environment are less important than corporate exploitation of natural resources. Our movement’s goal to institute authentic local self-governance will enable communities to protect their health, economies and local environment from corporate threats stemming from practices that elevate profit over community well-being.
In a time of depletion of natural resources and increasingly risky resource development and extraction, there is a critical need for laws governing local decisions about sustainability issues affecting energy production, land development, water use and food systems. Because the structure of current law allows corporations to have more power than communities in deciding what happens to these resources within the community, lack of protection makes communities vulnerable to exploitation. Appropriate and just local governance gives people the means to sustain themselves and the web of natural systems necessary to thrive.
What is the goal of community rights?
We work to dismantle the unjust structure of laws and systems of government that place corporate “rights” and privileges over the well-being of our communities. Our work seeks a single overriding solution: instituting our right to local self-government – so that communities have the legal foundation for saying no to harmful corporate practices whatever their form, whenever they arise. The right to do this is articulated in the principles of the Declaration of Independence and individual state constitutions. The goal is for local citizens to be able to exercise their right to make decisions affecting their community’s well being.
We look to the abolitionists, suffragists and civil rights activists who refused to obey unjust laws and worked to enact just laws. Suffragists challenged existing laws over 460 times, passing local and state laws recognizing women’s right to vote, which went against federal law. Oregon was one of two states that did so through the citizen initiative process. It took five attempts. Today, we too are constructing and working to pass just local laws, grounded in the right to local self-government.
Our work is local, but connected to a nationwide movement that has mounted community rights ordinances in over 160 communities in nine states, protecting them from a range of corporate threats, from fracking to industrial agricultural harms. This network, with the national Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund as an instrumental resource, is developing a foundation to build economic, political and social change at local, state, and ultimately, federal levels. Like the movements before us, we recognize that it will take years to succeed. But when we do, those levels of government will recognize, constitutionally, that the right to local self-government exists to protect the rights of communities and persons, not corporations.
Community rights transcends the environmental issues that catalyzed the movement. It will help us gain economic, social and environmental justice for all in our community.
What does CRLC do?
Community Rights Lane Country (CRLC) is building the Community Rights Movement in our region. We work to empower our communities to challenge and replace existing unjust laws with our own local, just laws. To this end, CRLC provides the organizing and educational infrastructure for citizens to mount community rights ordinances that protect our health, economy and environment. CRLC has function-based teams (education & events, communications, fundraising, etc.) and is developing geographic “hubs” (affiliated groups in communities throughout our region) that provide a place for all who share our commitment to have a real effect in securing community rights in our county. We also have events like monthly Community Rights Action gatherings to engage and activate our movement.
Join a Team: [email protected]
Come to a gathering: https://communityrightslanecounty.org/cra
Why do you refer to community rights as a civil rights movement?
Civil rights are rights to full legal, social, and economic equality. These rights protect individuals’ freedom from infringement by governments and private organizations. The Community Rights Movement works to protect our civil rights by ensuring that power resides where it is supposed to in a democracy – with the people and not corporations and governmental structures that place corporate “rights” above our own.
Who is CELDF?
CELDF is the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund, and is a national organization based in Pennsylvania, where the Community Rights Movement got its start. CELDF works with communities nationwide to establish environmental and economic sustainability by passing local laws under the communities’ right to self-government. Over 160 communities in nine states have already passed Community Rights ordinances, and CELDF has been a key resource in their success. Please visit http://www.celdf.org/ to learn more.
Why do we need an amendment to the Oregon constitution in order to draft local laws protecting our communities from corporate harms?
Although we assert that our right to local, community self-government is a fundamental and inherent right of the people, corporations have established a structure of state and federal law and a history of legal precedents that block communities from exercising this right. State preemption usurps the policymaking rights in specific areas to prevent local communities from writing laws to stop corporate harms. Judicially “found” corporate constitutional rights are wielded against local communities to block any local lawmaking that might impede corporate activities. An amendment to the Oregon constitution is needed to secure the rights of local communities to write local laws that establish fundamental rights for individuals, their communities and nature, and to secure those rights by banning certain activities, and to curtail rights claimed by corporations that that would interfere with these newly established rights. Our statewide amendment is also needed to insulate these local laws from pre-election challenges designed to keep these local laws off the ballot, and to prevent these laws from state, federal, and international preemption.
What is the basis of the right to local, community self-government and how does this right relate to the administration of state and federal law?
The right of local, community self-government is a fundamental, individual political right, exercised collectively, of people to govern the local communities in which they live. It is based on the basic principle that all political power is inherent in the people, is exercised by them for their benefit, and is subject to their control. The right is secured by the American Declaration of Independence, state constitutional bills of rights, and the United States Constitution. Because the right is inherent and inalienable, no government can define, diminish, or otherwise control it.
State governments have created bodies that administer state policy locally. However, the powers authorized by these local government agencies are separate from the people’s right of local, community self-government. The peoples’ right is not dependent upon state delegation of decision-making power and cannot be subject to state or federal constraints — constraints such as: allowing preemption of local lawmaking by state and federal laws; giving constitutional “rights” to corporations that compete with people’s civil and political rights; and allowing local governments to legislate only as authorized by state government.
How does our current legal system differ from one based in community rights?
A community rights legal system elevates the rights of human and natural communities over protection of corporate interests. A rights-based legal system helps to create a balanced relationship between local, state and federal levels of government. That balance does not exist today: Federal and state governments may legally preempt and regulate localities, and does so based on a system that considers commerce and the “rights” and privileges of corporations as central.
Could community rights be (mis)used to undo hard-won federal civil rights gains by overriding them at the local level?
Fundamental to the constitutional change sought by the Community Rights Movement is the establishment of a platform of rights that could not be legislated away by communities and government, and civil rights would be among them. In the meantime, existing civil rights protections are inalienable rights that cannot be overridden, even under our right to local self-government.
Get Involved Today!